Reformanda

April 18, 2009

Holiness in the Church

Filed under: Uncategorized — reformanda @ 5:37 pm

Titus 1

Paul and Titus traveled to Crete probably after release from his first imprisonment, during a fourth missionary journey which occurred after the close of Luke’s account in Acts and between 62 and 64 A.D. After having spent some time on Crete, Paul continued on to Macedonia from where he wrote this letter to Titus (Tit. 3:12). Titus was a regular companion of Paul on his travels, accompanying him on his second and third journeys as well as part of this one. Paul’s extensive description of his apostolic ministry and authority in the first four verses is not for Titus’ benefit but rather to reinforce to the residents of Crete that Titus was serving as Paul’s trusted representative.

Paul’s primary concern was for the proper behavior of the saints in Crete, that is, their holiness or holy living; in this epistle he specifically addresses the issue of holiness in the church, in the family, and in the world or community. This is in keeping with the principle that God has ordained three institutions with particular responsibilities in the affairs of men – the family sphere, the religious sphere, and the civic sphere of life. It is essential that the Christian live in accordance with biblical principles in all three spheres.

A. Salutation v. 1-4

If the order in which Paul treats the subjects is significant, he implies by addressing the church first that how one lives in the home and the community is directly associated with what he believes, what principles act as the foundation of his faith. Paul makes a specific connection between faith and practice in his greeting to Titus in verse 1 when he refers to “the faith of God’s elect and the acknowledgment of the truth which accords with godliness” (NKJV) or “the knowledge of the truth that leads to godliness” (1:1, NIV, HCSB) — belief governs behavior and right belief is based on truth as revealed ultimately through the living Word, Jesus Christ, and recorded in the written Word.

Paul has a specific body of truth in mind here; we understand that from the characteristics Paul applies to it. It is truth which:

1. leads to godliness v. 1b
2. provides hope of eternal life v. 2a
3. has its source in God v. 2b
4. was made apparent by Christ v. 3a
5. revealed in the Gospel v. 3b

Paul in a previous letter instructed Timothy that the church was the “pillar and foundation of the truth. Through the ministry of the Word by faithful pastors, the truth of God is communicated to mankind. The church through her God-given ministry preserves and maintains the purity of the truth in the world, transmitting it from one generation to another. Here in Titus 1, Paul reminds Titus what has been entrusted to the church and why it is important that the church be in good health. If it was essential for the first-century church to have her feet firmly planted on the truth, to maintain and proclaim a pure Gospel truth, how much more vital is it now in a culture which expresses great disdain for absolute truth.

B. Instruction: Well-qualified elders must be appointed in every town. v. 5-9

1st admonition – ordain Elders in every city v.5

Although Paul had spent some time on Crete working to establish churches with the help of Titus, it was necessary for him to go on to Macedonia before the task was complete. Consequently Paul was convinced the church and those dependent on it remained at risk from those who would cause it harm by their false and deceptive teaching. There on the island were churches gathered together but not fully organized, having members but without the necessary officers who would oversee and guard the individual flocks.

A local church, gathered and fully organized according to the mind of Christ, consists of officers and members. By Christ’s appointment the officers to be chosen and set apart by the church as called and gathered, are bishops (otherwise called elders) and deacons. It is their special responsibility to arrange for the carrying out of what the Lord has ordained, and to use the powers entrusted to them for the execution of their duties; and such arrangements are to continue in the church until the world ends. LBCF, XXVI.8

Paul in verse 5 reminds Titus of the task for which he left him there on the island, to finish establishing the churches by appointing or, perhaps a better description would be overseeing the appointment, of elders in each church town by town. As the apostles found it necessary to install deacons nominated by the members of the Jerusalem church, Titus was to do likewise in Crete. In each of the approximately one hundred towns on the island where there was a gathered church, Titus would need to guide each congregation in their search among their members for those leaders whom Christ had given them.

To aid both Titus and the various congregations, Paul gave particular qualifications by which to judge if potential candidates for leadership were biblically qualified. Both Paul and Peter address the issue of who is fit according to God’s standard for service in the office of elder – in 1 Timothy 3, here in Titus 1, and also in 1 Peter 5:1-3. Of the nearly two dozen words and phrases used by Paul and Peter, the vast majority deal with issues of character, not technical training. Godly character is critical in an elder since he is to be an example to the rest of the flock; remember Paul’s exhortation to the Philippian church, “Brethren, join in following my example, and note those who so walk, as you have us for a pattern.” Phil. 3:17 Similarly he told the saints in Corinth, “Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.” 1 Cor. 11:1

2nd admonition – faults Elders must not have, virtues they ought to have v.6-8

The overriding quality an elder must have is that of an unblemished reputation, not perfect and without any flaws, but possessing a good character which deserves the respect, love and admiration of the church. Because he holds a position of authority and trust he must be of irreproachable moral character and proven integrity. The first characteristic Paul lists as necessary for a married elder is that of marital faithfulness and sexual purity; if God has blessed them with children, they should be well-mannered and respectful. The other qualities emphasized by Paul focus on the integrity, self-control and spiritual maturity which must be found in an elder.

The negative v. 7

not arrogant

not quick-tempered

not a drunkard

not violent

not greedy for money

The positive v. 8

hospitable

a lover of or devoted to what is good

sober-minded or self-controlled, acting with discretion

upright or virtuous

holy or devout

disciplined

These qualities should be found in significant measure (if not to perfection) in an elder. Further, if an elder is not arrogant, he will be continually striving to develop his character in a godly direction and improve in those areas which are lacking.

Since an elder is responsible for leading and serving the household of faith, he must first have demonstrated the ability to do so in his own household. The nature of a church is that it requires family skills foremost over business skills; single elders are not automatically disqualified but elders with families do have practical experience that will prove invaluable for the flock. An elder must be the sort of godly example that others can and should follow, especially important since example carries a far greater weight of influence than position or title.

3rd admonition – Elder must hold fast the apostolic doctrine v. 9a

An elder must be firmly committed to biblical doctrine and have the ability to communicate it clearly to others; that quality alone prevents someone new to the faith from serving as an elder. This does not necessarily require an elder to have a theological degree but it does require him to be a mature and diligent student of the Bible. An elder must have sufficient understanding and experience of God’s love that it flows from him to the flock, inciting in them a love for Christ. If a primary task of an elder is to point others to Christ and draw them closer to him, he must have an intimate knowledge of the Word of God which is not stagnant but continually growing.

4th admonition – apply knowledge of true doctrine: governing apt learners, refuting the obstinate v. 9b

As you might expect an elder is not to pursue knowledge of biblical doctrine simply for the sake of adding to his supply of Scripture Factoids. Christ expects him to use that understanding for the benefit and growth of the Church, encouraging and enabling believers to grow in godliness while correcting those speak against the truth. In the words of one commentator, “This faithful word is a lever in his hands for moving the hearts of men.” William Graham, Commentary on Titus

The elder’s first task is to guide believers into a greater understanding of the truth, to use biblical principles when providing counsel, to hold up the standard of God’s Word as the completely sufficient rule of faith and practice. His second task is to correct those who distort the truth of Scripture, confirming true believers in their understanding and persuading those who deny the truth to turn from their errors. “The pastor ought to have two voices: one, for gathering the sheep; and another, for warding off and driving away wolves and thieves. The Scripture supplies him with the means of doing both.” John Calvin, Commentary on Titus

C. Reason: Crete is not lacking in disreputable people who must be sternly rebuked. v. 10-16

Sadly, but not surprisingly, there were those in Crete who professed with their mouths to be Christians but whose lives spoke a different profession. It would be relatively easy for those in the church to be fooled by smooth-talking “Christians”, especially if there was a lack of strong leadership in the churches. Claiming to speak for the church and proclaiming their version of the truth, they were really spreading distortions which resulted in whole families leaving the church and following the false teachers.

You don’t have to look far today to find self-appointed ambassadors who declare that their views are representative of the Christian community as a whole. In the name of love they promote an “anything goes” approach to marriage and family values, encouraging local legislators to redefine who’s who in the family. Just as it was necessary for Titus and his fellow pastors to stand against distortions of biblical truth, so it is necessary for pastors and elders to do the same in our present culture.

D. Encouragement: Christ is not destitute of resources out of which to supply his Church. Eph. 1:22-23; 4:7-12

There is great encouragement for the saints who are still pilgrims in the world; when Christ returned to glory and the seat of honor at his Father’s right hand, he remembered the Church. The one “who fills all things in every way”, who ascended to heaven “so that he might fill all things”, personally gave “some pastors and teachers for the training of the saints in the work of ministry”. Christ knows the needs of his people, of his Church and has committed to doing all that is necessary for its perseverance. He declared to his disciples that he would build his Church and the forces of even Hell itself would not be able to overpower it. Matt. 16:18 It is Christ who gathers his Church, who builds his Church, and who meets all her needs. He does all this from the place of honor and authority in heaven, lavishing blessings on his people from the vast and glorious riches of his grace. Eph. 1:7-8, 18-19

…one of the things, dear pastor reader, that you must take to heart is that God really did intend that the local church have local pastors. That is, pastors and not vigilante theological or political brawlers. Or, if I may say it without stepping on too many toes, a face on a jumbotron. Men who are, well, like the next part of this passage who are frankly charged with the well-being of Christ’s people for the sake of teaching them who Christ is, who He has made them, and what that means in their daily life.

Paul wanted Titus to establish elders. That was the plan. God says it’s a good idea, and you should agree with him. Frank Turk

March 22, 2009

Progressive Truth

Filed under: Uncategorized — reformanda @ 12:48 pm

2 John 1

From an article in the February, 2007 issue of Christianity Today entitled Five Streams of the Emerging Church by Scot McKnight, professor of religious studies at North Park Theological Seminary in Chicago, Illinois and who is happy to consider himself part of the emerging “conversation”:

“The emerging movement tends to be suspicious of systematic theology. Why? Not because we don’t read systematics, but because the diversity of theologies alarms us, no genuine consensus has been achieved, God didn’t reveal a systematic theology but a storied narrative, and no language is capable of capturing the Absolute Truth who alone is God. Frankly, the emerging movement loves ideas and theology. It just doesn’t have an airtight system or statement of faith. We believe the Great Tradition offers various ways for telling the truth about God’s redemption in Christ, but we don’t believe any one theology gets it absolutely right.

Hence, a trademark feature of the emerging movement is that we believe all theology will remain a conversation about the Truth who is God in Christ through the Spirit, and about God’s story of redemption at work in the church. No systematic theology can be final. In this sense, the emerging movement is radically Reformed. It turns its chastened epistemology [theory or science of the method or grounds of knowledge; Ed.] against itself, saying, “This is what I believe, but I could be wrong. What do you think? Let’s talk.”"

As sincere and heart-warming as this sounds, is it a biblical view of truth and theology? Did God reveal only a “storied narrative” or does his revelation include systematic theology? Does the idea that language is incapable of capturing the Truth who is God mean that no truth concerning God is unchanging and knowable? Does the absence of consensus and the diverse claims of various theologies preclude the possibility of a single theology that “gets it absolutely right”, that “[n]o systematic theology can be final”? Did the author of The Shack get theology right?

Perhaps the question should also be asked, “What ought our mindset to be toward our Christian brothers and sisters who out of love for the lost can be found toward the emergent (or postmodern) end of the ecclesiastical and philosophical spectrum?”

“It is much more popular to be tolerant of error than to try to correct it. Sentiment might dictate a less stern stand against falsehood.

A French proverb says, “There are times when to be only kind is to be not even kind.” John demonstrates, in his firmness motivated by love, that the sort of kindness which in our day answers to tolerance is not a manifestation of real Christian love in the presence of error.” Bible Study Textbook

A. a passion for the truth v. 1-4

1 The elder to the elect lady and her children, whom I love in truth, and not only I, but also all who know the truth, 2 because of the truth that abides in us and will be with us forever: 3 Grace, mercy, and peace will be with us, from God the Father and from Jesus Christ the Father’s Son, in truth and love. 4 I rejoiced greatly to find some of your children walking in the truth, just as we were commanded by the Father.

Jesus spoke of truth in absolute terms: “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.” John 17:17 John similarly speaks of truth in the first four verses of his letter to the church, using the term for truth that indicates: truth as the opposite of a lie or mere appearances, the reality rather than the appearance. In other words, Jesus and John both indicate that there is a reality and specific truth which corresponds with that reality.

John and Jesus both narrow the concept of truth by making it exclusive: “the truth” (John 17:17; 2 John 1:1-2 ) in contrast with “truth”. It is not any collection of truth, something that is mostly truth, a system of truth that is accurate but not comprehensive, of which John and Jesus speak. It is instead an exclusive, specific and comprehensive truth which corresponds to reality both natural and supernatural. Jesus declared himself to be the truth (John 14:6) and identified the Word of God as revealed truth. John, in the concept that the truth can abide in us (2 John 1:2), parallels Jesus’ thought about the Holy Spirit whom he identified three times as the “Spirit of Truth” (John 14:16-17; 15:26; 16:13), the one whom he and the Father would send.

Jesus and John further describe the truth as something which can be objectively known. Jesus says the Spirit will guide believers into all the truth (John 16:13); John addressed his epistle to those who “know the truth”, that is, those who have an intimate experiential knowledge and understanding. Thus truth can be known, it can be understood, and it corresponds to reality. If God’s Word is revealed truth, then, since God’s word is forever settled (or firmly fixed) in heaven (Psalm 119:89) some category of revealed truth must be absolute and unchanging.

It is for this sort of truth that John had a passion, a determination to follow and uphold. John was so concerned for the truth especially as it was perceived by his loved ones in the church that he felt compelled to issue a strong warning to them. John greatly rejoiced to see some of his spiritual children living according to the truth (see also 3 John 1:3) and was determined to do all he could to encourage them to persevere in the truth.

B. walking in the truth v. 4-6

4 I rejoiced greatly to find some of your children walking in the truth, just as we were commanded by the Father. 5 And now I ask you, dear lady-not as though I were writing you a new commandment, but the one we have had from the beginning-that we love one another. 6 And this is love, that we walk according to his commandments; this is the commandment, just as you have heard from the beginning, so that you should walk in it.

If the approach to truth is “This is what I believe, but I could be wrong. What do you think? Let’s talk.”, how do you get beyond conversation to action? While it may not be rank skepticism, it certainly sounds like a prime breeding ground for indecision. In fact, it puts me in mind of Paul’s description of spiritual “little children, tossed by the waves and blown around by every wind of teaching, by human cunning with cleverness in the techniques of deceit.” (Ephesians 4:14)

John leaves no room for debate here, he urges his readers to follow the command to love one another. John repeats the command given by Jesus in John 13:34 when he instructed his disciples to love one another as he had loved them, repeated by John in 1 John 2:7-8 and then again here. It is described as a command which is not new, yet new, the same as first given, yet different. The command from the beginning was to love God and love neighbor, the greatest commands according to Jesus and from which all other commands were derived. And in principle those two commands dated to the Garden, since to disobey even the one explicit command regarding the fruit immediately resulted in breaking the two Great Commands.

John’s reference to the beginning probably had the start of their Christian life in view; the application he makes is that what they believed about the truth was evidenced by their lives. If they believed Jesus was the truth, then they would keep his commands; if they believed the Bible was truth, they would obey its precepts. Again, John leaves no room for debate as he declares that the command which was in force at the beginning is still in force; the standard which was operative when they came to faith is still the standard.

John also makes it clear he believes that truth can be effectively communicated from God to man and that man can fully understand it. He didn’t rely on Jesus to filter and process the communication, making it intelligible to man on God’s behalf. John rejoiced to find saints within the church obeying the truth as “commanded by the Father”. The saints possessed the truth, it had been commanded, communicated, by God the Father, and it was unchanging. Although they possessed the truth, John was concerned that they maintain it, that they continue to walk in the truth, that they continue to love one another.

C. upholding the truth v. 7-11

9 Everyone who goes on ahead and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God. Whoever abides in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. ESV

9 Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God; the one who abides in the teaching, he has both the Father and the Son. NASB

Finally John issues a strong warning about those who perhaps had started out in the church and then left, going out into the world to spread their ideas about religion. Because of what they accomplish John compares them to Satan, the ultimate Deceiver, since they are busy doing his work for him. The particular error John has in view here is that of docetism, that Jesus only appeared to be human and thus there was no real incarnation and no substitutionary atonement.

John’s concern was that the saints would be seduced, drawn into the error and thus lose their grasp on the truth. While their salvation was secure, their sanctification and progress in holiness was by no means guaranteed. This is especially true if they departed from a right understanding of the truth and started behaving in ways inconsistent with the commands of God. Apparently there were sufficient elements of truth in what the deceivers taught that even the saints could be tricked, if not at first,then by repeated contact.

These Gnostics claimed to be the progressives, the advanced thinkers, and were anxious to relegate Christ to the past in their onward march. This struggle goes on always among those who approach the study of Christ. Is he a “landmark” merely or is he our goal and pattern? Progress we all desire, but progress toward Christ, not away from him. RWP

How like the mindset that is often expressed in liberal churches, in Supreme Court decisions, and in scientific debate: “biblical Christianity is primitive and outdated, we’ve moved beyond that in our thinking. As humanity has progressed and developed, we have reached new heights and must develop new and better paradigms in order to reach our full potential.” The same is true in the postmodern or emerging church: “we’ve moved beyond the need for a fixed and rigid theology, beyond an unchanging version of the Truth supposedly held by the historic church. At this stage of our culture we need a new paradigm, a more relaxed understanding that there may not be a single overarching explanation (metanarrative) of reality. Let’s talk about it and see what we come up with.”

Nowhere do we see any evidence in Scripture for Jesus using dialogue and the creative process to develop his theology. At the risk of personal harm, he staked out biblical territory in concrete and absolute terms, making it plain that the foundational truths of God’s Word were not negotiable or even open for debate. Repeatedly Jesus reinforced the old truths, correcting modern innovations and taking his hearers back to the foundations laid in the “Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms”. (Luke 24:44) To think that we have progressed beyond that way of thinking means that we have progressed beyond Christ, something which John denounces. In his inspired view, such a person was not a follower of Christ, a child of God.

John’s antidote for deceivers is twofold: (1) abide in the teaching of Christ and (2) provide no hospitality whatever for their teaching and no encouragement for them in their work. The order here is essential; in order for the saints to stay the course, they must remain fixed on the foundation which “no one can lay …other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.” (1 Corinthians 3:11) They must stay true to the teaching which pointed to Christ and that which he himself taught. Christ and his revelation is the “only sufficient, certain, and infallible rule of all saving Knowledge, Faith and Obedience”. (LBCF I.1) To go beyond Christ is to abandon him as the foundation and that which he showed by his example teaching to be all-sufficient. To stay with Christ requires as extensive an understanding of Scripture and knowledge of Christ as we can possibly achieve.

Second, he instructed the saints to be on guard against them, to be discerning and recognize the deception – “watch yourselves” – and not be sucked in by it. They were not to be wowed by the new ideas but to understand that what was being presented represented a departure from the historic faith of the church. As such, it was not to be encouraged or promoted in any way; the saints were not to be uncivil but neither were they to treat the deceivers as brothers. In John’s view, to promote their efforts directly or indirectly was equivalent to being one of them, actually involved in their work of deception.

What does that mean for us? Obviously we should use great care in directing our support, financial and otherwise. Things I try to avoid (besides the obvious ones – don’t invite the local cult missionaries in the door, etc.):

buying new books when I don’t want to encourage the author by running up their sales numbers. Buy used or borrow from a less discerning friend! Besides, we are to be good stewards of our finances.

reading a book or paper when good reviews from reliable sources will suffice.

filling your mind with questionable material. It’s one thing to be informed about error, it is quite another to become saturated with it. If you must get informed, be sure to intentionally intersperse material from a trusted source.

visiting websites that promote error. Many if not most have hit counters and running the numbers up will add to their revenue and encourage them.

So, is truth progressive? Well, it can be as long as it causes us to progress in our understanding of Christ and conformity to him. Diligent study of God’s Word with an eye to personal application accompanied by a regular use of the means of grace will surely cause a child of God to progress in sanctification. The study and application of any truth that draws us closer to Christ should be welcomed by the Christian; any “truth” which claims to improve our lot in life but serves to divert our attention or love away from Christ must be shunned. We MUST begin with God’s Word and filter all that we see and hear through the lens of Scripture; praise the Lord he has revealed himself to us in his Word and we have copies of our own to study and use.

October 25, 2008

The Tabernacle – The Boards

Filed under: Uncategorized — reformanda @ 8:22 pm

Exo 26:15-30 Exo 36:20-36

A. Their construction

“planks” 27″ wide, 15′ long

20 planks each for the north and south sides; 6 planks with 2 additional corner pieces for the west (back) side

5 crossbars for stability running the length of each side

a central crossbar which spanned the entire length, running through the center of the planks (Ex. 26:28; 36:33)

the other four crossbars on the outside running through gold rings or staples

outside dimensions of the tabernacle – 15′ x 45′

planks and crossbars made from acacia wood overlaid with gold

2 cast silver “bases” for the tenons on the bottom of each plank – a total of 96 bases or sockets each containing a talent or approximately 75 pounds of silver (Ex. 38:27)

B. Their use

make a house with two apartments

support the four coverings

blue, purple and scarlet linen
white goat’s hair
red ram skin
manatee skin

if they were solid rather than simple frames, provide a reflective surface to magnify light from the lampstand

assemble to make a sturdy yet portable structure

C. Their significance

David: “I’ll build You a house.” God: “I’ll build you a house; Your son will build me a house.” 2 Samuel 7:4-14

God to Solomon: “If Israel rejects me, I will reject my house.” 1 Kings 9:6-9

The OT saints: looked for a city with real foundations, aspiring to a better land. Hebrews 11:10; 11:13-16 ; 13:14

The enduring spiritual house: the saints 1 Corinthians 3:9-17 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 2 Corinthians 6:16-18 1 Peter 2:4-5

The sockets/bases: two things toward which they could point

1. the foundation of the church – Peter’s confession (Matthew 16:16); the apostles and prophets (Ephesians 2:19-20)

2. strangers/pilgrims in the land but not taking root in it: Psalm 39:12 Hebrews 11:13

Blog at WordPress.com.